Improving Laboratory Sustainability

Reducing research-related environmental impacts

Funding from the RSC Sustainable Labs

Challenge

Scientific research has a significant environmental impact from energy, water, and materials. Lab spaces use between 5-10 times the energy than an office of the same size. While sustainability initiatives such as the Laboratory Efficiency Assessment Framework (LEAF) offer structured guidance, we found numerous fundamental gaps in identifying, and quantifying the benefits of, best practices for sustainable laboratory operations. Presumptions of what is more sustainable can influence the choices researchers make each day on how best to heat, cool, analyse, dispose, reuse, and test. Identifying and validating optimal strategies for reducing research-related environmental impacts is crucial for sustainable research which can drive innovations for a sustainable future.

Solution

With funding secured through an RSC Sustainable Labs grant, we aimed to assess and implement sustainable laboratory practices through a combination of experimental, analytical, and life cycle assessment (LCA) methodologies. Key initiatives included:

  1. Evaluating Green Solvents – Investigating the use of biobased solvents in gel permeation chromatography to assess their efficacy and environmental impacts to reduce the footprint of polymer analysis.
  2. Laboratory Heating Energy Use – Analysing the energy consumption of benchtop heating media (oil bath, bead bath and heating blocks) and quantifying the impact on energy efficiency and the embodied carbon when applying foil covering.
  3. Reusable Glassware – Using life cycle analysis to examine the environmental and practical impacts of reusing so-called “disposable” glassware in laboratory settings.

Impact

The initial findings of this project are already helping to shape evidence-based best practices for more sustainable laboratory operations.

  • Encourage vial reuse where possible. Life cycle analysis shows that can cleaning and reusing vials can significantly lower environmental impacts.
  • Foil coverings can reduce the energy consumption but must be reused 10 times to be environmentally beneficial.
  • Biobased solvents can be applied to GPC, although their use can result in higher environmental impacts.

Share this story

Could your business benefit from a partnership with the SMI Hub?

Get in touch

More Experience

Reducing Healthcare’s Environmental Impact

CHaMP - Circularity in Healthcare Materials Provision

Find out more

Improving Laboratory Sustainability

Reducing research-related environmental impacts

Find out more

Functional Polymers

Exploring fundamental polymer chemistry

Find out more

Sustainable Automotive Polymers

Improving the sustainability of automotive plastics

Find out more

Smart Sustainable Plastic Packaging

One Bin to Rule them All

Find out more

Ecobelt

Repairing Conveyor Belts

Find out more

Mastercard

Circular Payment Cards

Find out more

Unilever

Sustainable Formulations

Find out more

PragmatIC Research Secondment

Investigation of recycling methods for RFID tags 

Find out more

SparkLife

More sustainable jump ropes

Find out more

Manchester Gin

Evaluation of Multilaminate Pouches and Plastic Bottles as Gin Packaging

Find out more

Manchester Breweries

Sustainability advice and understanding plastic packaging flows

Find out more

White Rabbit Distribution Ltd.

Sustainable Materials for a Circular Phone Case

Find out more

Thermocill

Suitability and sustainability of recycled nylon and potential alternatives

Find out more

Fibrestar

Water resistant coatings for fibre drums

Find out more

Oceanbound

Identifying sustainable adhesive materials for recycled footwear

Find out more

Sign-up to our mailing list

Hear about the latest news, opinions and activities from the SMI Hub